What if only eve ate the fruit

If the latter option is true then this complicates matters further for this question as it means there are no hard rules. In Genesis 3 Adam, Eve and the serpent each receive a specific curse as punishment for their actions vv In addition Adam and Eve, who ate the fruit, are cast out of the garden to prevent them from living forever vv If we assume God would have made the same judgment if only Eve ate of the fruit then she would have received the same curse and would have been cast out of the garden, whilst Adam would have remained in the garden without any curse.

As a consequence Eve would be alone outside the garden assuming no pre-Adamic humans and not had any children. A further question is what would be the extent of the curse in this scenario.

Note however that the Garden was not the totality of Eden, it was just a part of Eden. To give you some sense of the size a river flowed from Eden to water the Garden. Using the modern coordinates of these rivers some have speculated Eden must have been located in either Iraq Southern Mesopotamia or the Persian Gulf. The earth after all has altered significantly since prehistoric era. Genesis That sword was some sort of firewall. It prevented access to the Tree of Life. Note that the cherubim had capacity to transform himself into a flame of fire too.

Hebrews So there was a double firewall — one wall to guard entrance to the garden, the other to guard access to the Tree of Life.

And for all we know the trees might have been transplanted! We tend to talk more about the other tree. Much of the information about the Tree of Life is extra-Genesis. In the Book of Proverbs it is associated with wisdom Proverb , righteousness Proverb , hope and fulfillment of dreams Proverb , as well as healing Proverb The Book of Revelation gives us its idiosyncratic characteristics. We know for example that it has twelve varieties of fruits!

Revelation We also know it has economic and political properties. Revelation , And so we see the applications and macro dimensions of the Tree of Life. It foreshadowed the political evolution of Adam into a national community yet offers the citizens wisdom for living, hope and fulfillment of dreams, inalienable constitutional rights righteousness and health. This was no ordinary tree. Indeed outside the Garden the variety is only found in Heaven.

Only the righteous can partake of it. Which is why it was okay for Adam to eat from the Tree of Life before the fall. But after the fall he needed assigned righteousness through the blood of the Lamb Jesus to partake of the Tree of Life. Revelation Salvation is thus the partaking of the Tree of Life. John And the Tree of Life is also a portal to Heaven. Revelation The Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil was no ordinary horticultural totem either.

For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil. He noticed that they had eaten the fruit of the tree of knowledge, and turned them out of Paradise. By the sweat of your face you shall eat bread , till you return to the ground, for out of it you were taken; for you are dust and to dust you shall return. The Bible does not actually mention an apple — early Christian art depicts the Fall of Man by a fig. In Latin, evil is malum and an apple is called malus.

This could have been either a simple mistranslation or a deliberate play on the these words. An apple already featured in one of the earliest depictions of the Fall of Man from the 2 nd century CE in the catacombs of San Gennaro in Naples.

According to the Christian doctrine, original sin , also known as ancestral sin, is a consequence of the fall of man.